Close Menu
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Offshore
    • Oil & Gas
    • Energy
  • Advertising
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Trending
  • Algorithm Accountability
  • Ports Urge Congress to Reverse Cuts to Port Infrastructure Funding
  • Yinson Production buys out $409m FPSO loan from Brava Energia
  • Revenue growth for Twin Vee PowerCats in Q2 2025 results
  • Golar firms up 20-year FLNG unit hire in Argentina
  • Wreck Of Long-Lost Pirate Ship Discovered In North Carolina
  • Seadrill rig pair hired for drilling programs in the US Gulf of Mexico
  • GCMD, INTERCARGO team up on dry bulk decarbonization
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Tech
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Oil & Gas
    • Offshore
    • Energy
  • Advertising
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
Home»Maritime»Chinese owners and yards come out fighting in US trade dispute
Maritime

Chinese owners and yards come out fighting in US trade dispute

March 14, 2025
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Chinese Shipowners Associations Criticize US Trade Proposals

Both the China Shipowners’ Association (CSA) and the China Association of the National Shipbuilding Industry (CANSI) have publicly criticized the US Trade Representative’s proposals to charge extra fees for fleets with Chinese-built tonnage calling at American ports, marking a potential major policy shift in the shipping industry during the early days of Donald Trump’s return to the White House.

The US Trade Representative (USTR) has been investigating China’s increasing dominance in maritime activities, particularly in shipbuilding, over the past year. The USTR report accuses China of artificially suppressed labor costs, forced technology transfer, and intellectual property theft. The recommended measures include potential fees of up to $1.5 million per port call for Chinese-built vessels, $1 million per port call for operators of Chinese-built ships, and mandatory US-flag shipping requirements.

In response, CSA filed a comment on the USTR site, denouncing the proposed actions as discriminatory and in violation of World Trade Organization rules and dispute settlement rulings. The association also cited violations of the 2003 Sino-US Maritime Agreement, US laws, and rules.

Similarly, CANSI opposed the USTR’s proposals, highlighting concerns about the impact on the global shipping industry.

As anticipation of Trump’s potential penalties on Chinese-built tonnage grows, a two-tier market is beginning to emerge. Broker BRS reported that Chinese-linked ships are becoming less attractive for long-term charters due to the uncertainty of potential US port calls. Law firm Hill Dickinson has also noted revisions to charter-party wordings in anticipation of the clampdown on Chinese-built tonnage by the US.

See also  Chinese chief engineer jailed in the US

Despite the US government’s intentions to boost the American shipbuilding industry, China’s foreign ministry stated that the proposed measures would not achieve this goal and that China would take steps to protect its rights and interests.

According to Clarksons Research, nearly 37,000 US port calls last year were made by ships connected to China, potentially facing the maximum $1.5 million fee. This represents a significant portion of containership calls but only a smaller percentage of tanker stops.

China has rapidly risen to dominate the global shipbuilding market, holding a two-thirds market share by the end of last year compared to the US’s less than 1% share. The gap between American and Chinese shipbuilding capabilities is attributed to differences in industrial infrastructure, with China’s robust manufacturing base surpassing that of the US.

In conclusion, the escalating tensions between the US and China in the maritime sector underscore broader geopolitical and economic challenges facing the global shipping industry.

Chinese Dispute fighting owners Trade yards
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related Posts

Algorithm Accountability

August 10, 2025

Ports Urge Congress to Reverse Cuts to Port Infrastructure Funding

August 10, 2025

Revenue growth for Twin Vee PowerCats in Q2 2025 results

August 10, 2025
Top Posts

Duties of Bosun (Boatswain) on a Ship

February 1, 2025

China Fights Australia’s Plans to Reclaim Darwin Port Citing U.S. Influence

May 27, 2025

Fire-Stricken Wan Hai 503 Continues to Drift Off Indian Coast as Salvage Efforts Intensify

June 11, 2025

Car Carrier ‘Morning Midas’ Catches Fire with Electric Vehicles Off Alaska

June 5, 2025
Don't Miss
Energy

EIC Accelerator backs CorPower Ocean with up to €17.5M to advance wave energy tech

February 18, 2025

CorPower Ocean Secures €17.5 Million Funding from EIC Accelerator Swedish wave energy technology developer CorPower…

Solstad scores CSV contract in Brazil with Petrobras

July 17, 2025

The Multihull Company named Nautitech dealer

April 28, 2025

What are Hague-Visby Rules?

January 10, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

About Us
About Us

Stay informed with the latest in maritime, offshore, oil & gas, and energy industries. Explore news, trends, and insights shaping the global energy landscape.

For advertising inquiries, contact us at
info@maritime247.com.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Our Picks

Dolphin Drilling’s 1990-built rig moves to P&A ops in North Sea

May 7, 2025

Victor Offers Free Safety Audits To Qualifying

June 7, 2025

Gas Leak on a Barge Prompts Community Alerts on Houston Ship Channel

April 24, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

© 2025 maritime247.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertising

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.