Close Menu
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Offshore
    • Oil & Gas
    • Energy
  • Advertising
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Trending
  • Container Losses Rise in 2024 as Red Sea Crisis Forces Riskier Routes
  • ILO to map gaps in Pakistan shipbreaking in the wake of HKC
  • Seventh FPSO prepares to join Petrobras’ Santos Basin field
  • One of UK’s Largest Cocaine Seizures Made at London Gateway Port
  • Danos Awarded Production Services Contract for Beacon Offshore Energy Deepwater Facility
  • Container Losses At Sea Rise In 2024 Due To Red Sea Disruptions
  • Nexans’ new cable layer traveling from Poland to Norway to finalize construction
  • NTSB Issues Preliminary Report on Mexican Navy Tall Ship Collision with Brooklyn Bridge
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Tech
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Oil & Gas
    • Offshore
    • Energy
  • Advertising
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
Home»Incidents»NTSB Finds Communication Gap Led to $4.5 Million Crane Accident at Charleston Terminal
Incidents

NTSB Finds Communication Gap Led to $4.5 Million Crane Accident at Charleston Terminal

March 31, 2025
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

The National Transportation Safety Board Releases Findings on Crane Accident at North Charleston Terminal

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released findings on a costly crane accident at North Charleston Terminal that resulted in $4.5 million in damage when a crane barge struck a ship-to-shore crane during cargo operations.

The incident occurred on January 4, 2024, when the towing vessel Royal Engineer, while pushing the crane barge Stevens 1471, attempted to navigate a challenging passage between the containership Celsius Nicosia and a dredging vessel on the Cooper River.

According to NTSB investigators, the accident stemmed from delayed communication between the Royal Engineer’s mate and the dredge crew. Despite multiple attempts to establish contact for passing arrangements, communication wasn’t achieved until approximately 15 minutes before reaching the critical area.

The situation became complicated when the dredge captain suggested a western passage, contrary to the mate’s original plan to request breaking the pipeline for an eastern route. The two parties agreed to proceed through the narrow corridor between the dredge and the containership.


The horizontal extent of the North Charleston Terminal ship-to-shore crane. (Source: NTSB)

The critical oversight occurred during these passing arrangements. The Royal Engineer’s mate failed to account for the ship-to-shore crane’s extension beyond the containership’s side, which created an overhead hazard.

In its safety message, the NTSB emphasized that “Ship-to-shore cranes, when conducting cargo operations on a vessel and in the lowered position, may extend considerably beyond the side of the vessel and become a hazard to vessels with high air drafts transiting nearby.”

The agency stressed the importance of mariners considering their vessel and tow’s air draft when identifying navigational hazards.

See also  Prysmian drops plan to build $200 million subsea cable factory in Massachusetts

The complete findings are available in Marine Investigation Report 25-09.

logo

Subscribe for Daily Maritime Insights

Sign up for gCaptain’s newsletter and never miss an update

— trusted by our 108,945 members

accident Charleston Communication Crane Finds Gap Led Million NTSB Terminal
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related Posts

Container Losses Rise in 2024 as Red Sea Crisis Forces Riskier Routes

July 1, 2025

NTSB Issues Preliminary Report on Mexican Navy Tall Ship Collision with Brooklyn Bridge

June 30, 2025

Maersk Sues as Controversy Emerges Over Bidding for Santos’ New Terminal

June 27, 2025
Top Posts

Car Carrier ‘Morning Midas’ Catches Fire with Electric Vehicles Off Alaska

June 5, 2025

China Fights Australia’s Plans to Reclaim Darwin Port Citing U.S. Influence

May 27, 2025

Denmark awards first-ever offshore wind farm life extension permit

June 4, 2025

Fire-Stricken Wan Hai 503 Continues to Drift Off Indian Coast as Salvage Efforts Intensify

June 11, 2025
Don't Miss
Energy

Monjasa conducts Panama’s ‘first-ever’ biofuel bunkering operation

March 31, 2025

Monjasa Completes First ISCC-Certified Biofuel Supply Operation in Panama Marine fuels supplier Monjasa has made…

Eneos Drilling seals jackup deal in Vietnam

April 6, 2025

Van Oord, DEME-CSBC JV to install Fengmiao 1 inter-array cables, foundations

January 13, 2025

WATCH: FPU heads off to Black Sea ahead of doubling Türkiye’s gas production in 2026

May 30, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

About Us
About Us

Stay informed with the latest in maritime, offshore, oil & gas, and energy industries. Explore news, trends, and insights shaping the global energy landscape.

For advertising inquiries, contact us at
info@maritime247.com.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Our Picks

CMA CGM adds another 2,000 TEU LNG-powered vessel to its fleet

January 7, 2025

Growing cyber risk means owners should get ready for more regulation

December 31, 2024

With ‘strong market interest’, VTTI advances Amplifhy project to the next phase

May 18, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

© 2025 maritime247.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertising

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.