Close Menu
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Offshore
    • Oil & Gas
    • Energy
  • Advertising
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Trending
  • International Chamber Of Shipping Appoints New Chairman, Welcomes Malta As Full Member
  • Carolina Governors Urge Trump Officials to Maintain Offshore Drilling Moratorium
  • A Key Freight Indicator Is Flashing Red — Here’s What It Means for Global Trade
  • Wave energy desalination pilot gets green light in Fort Bragg
  • TotalEnergies strengthens ties with Chevron by expanding US oil & gas offshore footprint
  • Uncrewed Survey Solutions Makes Key Appointments
  • Tug Garth Foss now assisting stricken car carrier Morning Midas
  • Bureau Veritas launches AI-driven tool, Augmented Surveyor 3D
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Tech
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Oil & Gas
    • Offshore
    • Energy
  • Advertising
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
Home»Port»Australia Looks to Avoid a Panama Repeat in China Port Showdown
Port

Australia Looks to Avoid a Panama Repeat in China Port Showdown

May 29, 2025
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Prime Minister Albanese Faces Diplomatic Challenge Over Port of Darwin

By Ben Westcott and James Mayger

May 28, 2025 (Bloomberg) – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is confronting a fresh diplomatic dilemma with China: How to fulfill a pledge to regain control of a strategic port without jeopardizing improved relations with his country’s largest trading partner.

Ahead of an election earlier this month, Albanese promised to return to Australian control the Port of Darwin from Chinese company Landbridge Group. It was awarded a 99-year lease in 2015 by the Northern Territory government in a move that sparked criticism from an array of politicians in Australia and in the US, which uses a nearby military training facility.

China is Australia’s biggest trading partner by far and previously expressed anger over pressure from the Trump administration concerning the Panama Canal, which resulted in a potential sale by a Hong Kong-based conglomerate of its two Panama port operations — a deal Beijing has said it will review.

Albanese potentially faces a similar backlash from the Chinese government if Beijing perceives it’s being treated unfairly at the Port of Darwin.

“The key is whether it’s a commercial or ostensibly a commercial transaction or not,” said Richard McGregor, a senior fellow at Sydney-based Lowy Institute, who serves on the board of a government body advising on relations with China.

A simple buyout of Landbridge by an Australian company would be significantly less controversial than a sale to a US business or an attempt to cancel the lease and nationalize it, he said.

High Stakes

China’s government would like for its firms to be able to invest more into Australia, especially in the minerals sector, but Canberra has blocked a series of investment proposals since the two signed a free-trade agreement more than a decade ago.

See also  Port of Long Beach Braces for May Slump Following Record-Breaking April

That raises the stakes for how Albanese manages the port dispute. Bilateral relations collapsed during the pandemic, when China imposed tariffs and trade barriers on Australian goods, but have gradually improved since Albanese first took power in 2022.

Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia, has warned Canberra to proceed cautiously in its handling of the lease, which he said was awarded to Landbridge “through an open and transparent bidding process.” He made the point of personally visiting Darwin in the past week to press Beijing’s request for Landbridge to be treated fairly.

While Landbridge has been reported to be having financial difficulties, Chinese state media also cautioned against forcing Landbridge to give up the lease.

A Global Times editorial this week said the Australian government should “prioritize the broader picture, uphold the spirit of contract, return to the rule of law, and stop distorting economic cooperation with political bias.”

The port is Australia’s northernmost maritime facility, positioned close to Southeast Asia.

During the election campaign, Albanese raised the possibility of nationalizing the facility in case a private owner couldn’t be found. US private equity company Cerberus held an initial meeting with the Port of Darwin to discuss taking over the lease, while other Australian entities including large pension funds are also running a ruler over the numbers.

‘Far From Ideal’

Since 2001, Chinese firms have increasingly invested in overseas ports. That’s often been portrayed as part of President Xi Jinping’s “Belt and Road Initiative” to build up trade links between China and the rest of the world.

See also  First Drop for Inbound Containers Forecast After Surge Ahead of Tariffs

Some of those investments have become controversial or been criticized as a vehicle for greater Chinese influence, although some, such as the purchase of Piraeus Port in Greece by Chinese shipping giant Cosco Shipping Holdings Co., can be seen as a success.

While the Port of Darwin hasn’t attracted the same level of attention from Washington as the Panama Canal, that doesn’t mean that the US isn’t watching closely.

“For many of our allies and partners, the current status quo is far from ideal,” said Luke Gosling, a military veteran and lawmaker for Darwin in Albanese’s Labor government. “That has fed into obviously our decision-making around making that commitment that the Port of Darwin come back into Australian hands.”

© 2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Subscribe for Daily Maritime Insights

Sign up for gCaptain’s newsletter and never miss an update

— trusted by our 109,041 members

Australia avoid China Panama Port Repeat Showdown
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related Posts

A Key Freight Indicator Is Flashing Red — Here’s What It Means for Global Trade

June 17, 2025

Port of LA Settles Stormwater Pollution Lawsuit

June 16, 2025

Brand New STS Crane Tips Over at Port of Tuas

June 15, 2025
Top Posts

Coast Guard Overflight Footage Reveals Fire Spreading on Morning Midas Car Carrier Off Alaska Coast

June 6, 2025

China Fights Australia’s Plans to Reclaim Darwin Port Citing U.S. Influence

May 27, 2025

Car Carrier ‘Morning Midas’ Catches Fire with Electric Vehicles Off Alaska

June 5, 2025

Tallest Lighthouse Still in Operation at Sea

May 30, 2025
Don't Miss
Offshore

Geoquip Marine wraps up survey work for two offshore wind projects in Germany

May 21, 2025

Geoquip Marine Completes Geotechnical Site Investigation for 4 GW Offshore Wind Projects in German North…

SEA-CARE group launched to boost maritime safety

January 9, 2025

BP Achieves First Gas at Major West Africa Offshore Project

January 3, 2025

Clarksons Port Services to support O&M of RWE’s German offshore wind farm

June 11, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

About Us
About Us

Stay informed with the latest in maritime, offshore, oil & gas, and energy industries. Explore news, trends, and insights shaping the global energy landscape.

For advertising inquiries, contact us at
info@maritime247.com.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Our Picks

What is a Mast Riser?

April 4, 2025

Sanctions still don’t work – Splash247

May 31, 2025

In 2024, LNG Solidified Its Role in Shipping’s Decarbonization

December 27, 2024

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

© 2025 maritime247.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertising

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.