Close Menu
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Offshore
    • Oil & Gas
    • Energy
  • Advertising
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Trending
  • Changing nature of Protector Boats’ maritime models
  • Houthis Provide FAQs On How Ships Can Avoid Becoming Their Target In The Red Sea
  • how owners challenge the design process
  • Oil Tanker & Cargo Ship Catches Fire, Killing Captain & Injuring 2 Crew Members
  • Jiangsu Dajin Heavy Industry bags order for six AHTS vessels
  • Fresh gas storage license for Snam’s subsidiary in East Irish Sea fueling UK’s hydrogen dreams
  • Asian Nations Battle For Shipbuilding Share
  • Seacontractors revealed as buyer of DOF anchor handler pair
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Tech
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Oil & Gas
    • Offshore
    • Energy
  • Advertising
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
Home»Incidents»NTSB Finds Communication Gap Led to $4.5 Million Crane Accident at Charleston Terminal
Incidents

NTSB Finds Communication Gap Led to $4.5 Million Crane Accident at Charleston Terminal

March 31, 2025
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

The National Transportation Safety Board Releases Findings on Crane Accident at North Charleston Terminal

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released findings on a costly crane accident at North Charleston Terminal that resulted in $4.5 million in damage when a crane barge struck a ship-to-shore crane during cargo operations.

The incident occurred on January 4, 2024, when the towing vessel Royal Engineer, while pushing the crane barge Stevens 1471, attempted to navigate a challenging passage between the containership Celsius Nicosia and a dredging vessel on the Cooper River.

According to NTSB investigators, the accident stemmed from delayed communication between the Royal Engineer’s mate and the dredge crew. Despite multiple attempts to establish contact for passing arrangements, communication wasn’t achieved until approximately 15 minutes before reaching the critical area.

The situation became complicated when the dredge captain suggested a western passage, contrary to the mate’s original plan to request breaking the pipeline for an eastern route. The two parties agreed to proceed through the narrow corridor between the dredge and the containership.


The horizontal extent of the North Charleston Terminal ship-to-shore crane. (Source: NTSB)

The critical oversight occurred during these passing arrangements. The Royal Engineer’s mate failed to account for the ship-to-shore crane’s extension beyond the containership’s side, which created an overhead hazard.

In its safety message, the NTSB emphasized that “Ship-to-shore cranes, when conducting cargo operations on a vessel and in the lowered position, may extend considerably beyond the side of the vessel and become a hazard to vessels with high air drafts transiting nearby.”

The agency stressed the importance of mariners considering their vessel and tow’s air draft when identifying navigational hazards.

See also  GPS Spoofing Suspected in Containership's Grounding Near Jeddah Port

The complete findings are available in Marine Investigation Report 25-09.

logo

Subscribe for Daily Maritime Insights

Sign up for gCaptain’s newsletter and never miss an update

— trusted by our 108,945 members

accident Charleston Communication Crane Finds Gap Led Million NTSB Terminal
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related Posts

X-Press Feeders Blasts ‘Extraordinary’ Sri Lanka Court Ruling Over X-Press Pearl Disaster

August 15, 2025

US firm finds work on $8 billion gas development in Africa

August 11, 2025

Inadequate Design, Certification and Maintenance Led to Titan Disaster

August 9, 2025
Top Posts

Duties of Bosun (Boatswain) on a Ship

February 1, 2025

China Fights Australia’s Plans to Reclaim Darwin Port Citing U.S. Influence

May 27, 2025

Fire-Stricken Wan Hai 503 Continues to Drift Off Indian Coast as Salvage Efforts Intensify

June 11, 2025

Car Carrier ‘Morning Midas’ Catches Fire with Electric Vehicles Off Alaska

June 5, 2025
Don't Miss
Energy

Net-zero quest: South Korea, Australia to create green shipping corridor

February 11, 2025

South Korea and Australia Collaborate to Establish Green Shipping Corridor South Korea and Australia have…

Maersk Ready for Ops with New Methanol-Fueled 17,480 TEU Container Ship

June 19, 2025

South Korea’s Taihan Cable & Solution wins domestic inter-array cable contract

August 4, 2025

Economou’s TMS Group to splash up to $1.4B on LNG dual-fuel containership fleet

February 5, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

About Us
About Us

Stay informed with the latest in maritime, offshore, oil & gas, and energy industries. Explore news, trends, and insights shaping the global energy landscape.

For advertising inquiries, contact us at
info@maritime247.com.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Our Picks

Two Children Dead After Sailboat and Barge Collide Near Miami

July 29, 2025

A Look Back at Recent Car Carrier Fires

June 6, 2025

BOEM publishes PNOS for U.S. Gulf oil and gas Lease Sale 262

June 26, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

© 2025 maritime247.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertising

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.