Close Menu
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Offshore
    • Oil & Gas
    • Energy
  • Advertising
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Trending
  • European refiners could drive green hydrogen momentum, with maritime sector playing important role
  • North Sea yields ‘significant’ black gold discovery
  • Falmouth Scientific, Inc. Receives ISO 9001:2015 Quality Certification
  • New leadership for Oceanbird – Splash247
  • Boats Group lawsuit alleges monopoly in US listings
  • Hollandse Kust West Beta cable tests completed
  • New Fred. Olsen 1848 floating solar lead brings experience from SolarDuck, Equinor
  • Strohm’s TCP jumpers make their way to Malaysian deepwater sector
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Tech
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Oil & Gas
    • Offshore
    • Energy
  • Advertising
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
Home»Port»Trump’s Port Fee Plan Could Upend U.S. Shipping Schedules
Port

Trump’s Port Fee Plan Could Upend U.S. Shipping Schedules

April 4, 2025
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

Shipping Industry Considers Strategies to Navigate Trump Administration Policies

By Ira Breskin

Shipping industry executives are currently grappling with potential disruptions caused by policy changes under consideration or already enacted by the Trump administration. At the 40th annual Connecticut Maritime Association meeting in Stamford, CT, speakers discussed various options to address these challenges.

One of the key concerns for containership operators is the looming prospect of costly port fees proposed by the Trump administration. To avoid these fees, operators are contemplating radical changes to their ship schedules. Bethann Rooney, the port director for the Port of New York and New Jersey (PONY/NJ), expressed apprehension about the potential impact on smaller secondary ports if vessels are rerouted to major US “load center” ports.

Rooney emphasized that the repercussions of such a decision could be more severe than the congestion experienced at West Coast ports during the COVID-19 pandemic. With PONY/NJ being one of the busiest container ports on the East Coast, redirecting container ships to this port could significantly increase its container throughput to over 16 million TEU annually.

The proposed port fees, aimed at foreign-flagged ships calling at US ports, are intended to incentivize the use of US-flagged commercial vessels. This has led to containership operators considering major schedule adjustments to mitigate the financial impact of these fees.

Meanwhile, amidst the regulatory uncertainties, niche New England port operators are continuing to support wind farm operations near their ports. This comes in the wake of the Trump administration’s Executive Order halting permits for additional offshore wind farm development in federal waters.

See also  U.S. Container Import Growth Set to Reverse as Tariffs and Ship Fees Loom

While the potential schedule modifications and market bifurcation pose challenges for the shipping industry, industry experts believe that any disruptions may be short-lived. Trump’s successor in office could potentially overturn these policies, offering some hope for a more stable operating environment in the future.

Ira Breskin is a senior lecturer at State University of New York Maritime College and author of The Business of Shipping (9th edition, 2018).

Subscribe for Daily Maritime Insights

Sign up for gCaptain’s newsletter and never miss an update

— trusted by our 109,044 members

Fee plan Port Schedules Shipping Trumps U.S Upend
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related Posts

First commercial port site in Taiwan ready for wave energy pilot

August 20, 2025

Shipping Largest Sector- Dry Bulk

August 20, 2025

Russian Drones Damage Tanker During Attack on Oil Terminal in Izmail

August 20, 2025
Top Posts

Duties of Bosun (Boatswain) on a Ship

February 1, 2025

China Fights Australia’s Plans to Reclaim Darwin Port Citing U.S. Influence

May 27, 2025

Fire-Stricken Wan Hai 503 Continues to Drift Off Indian Coast as Salvage Efforts Intensify

June 11, 2025

Sea-Doo Switch recall underway after serious safety concerns

March 2, 2025
Don't Miss
Oil & Gas

With funding locked in, UK firm adds Asia Pacific drilling campaign to summer plans

April 26, 2025

UK-based Sunda Energy Signs Agreements for Offshore Timor-Leste Drilling Campaign UK-based and AIM-listed Sunda Energy,…

Baker Hughes picks up P&A gig at North Sea oil field

June 12, 2025

Top U.S. Officer Warns That China is Rehearsing Plans to Take Over Taiwan

February 18, 2025

First Hybrid Electric, Hydrogen Capable, CSOV Nears Delivery

July 29, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

About Us
About Us

Stay informed with the latest in maritime, offshore, oil & gas, and energy industries. Explore news, trends, and insights shaping the global energy landscape.

For advertising inquiries, contact us at
info@maritime247.com.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Our Picks

Petrobras Aims to Lure Chinese Investments to Brazil’s Naval Sector

April 29, 2025

REGENT working to get USCG approval for all-electric seagliers

March 21, 2025

TotalEnergies adds more time to Northern Drilling semisub deal

December 30, 2024

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

© 2025 maritime247.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertising

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.