Close Menu
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Offshore
    • Oil & Gas
    • Energy
  • Advertising
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Trending
  • European refiners could drive green hydrogen momentum, with maritime sector playing important role
  • North Sea yields ‘significant’ black gold discovery
  • Falmouth Scientific, Inc. Receives ISO 9001:2015 Quality Certification
  • New leadership for Oceanbird – Splash247
  • Boats Group lawsuit alleges monopoly in US listings
  • Hollandse Kust West Beta cable tests completed
  • New Fred. Olsen 1848 floating solar lead brings experience from SolarDuck, Equinor
  • Strohm’s TCP jumpers make their way to Malaysian deepwater sector
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Tech
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Oil & Gas
    • Offshore
    • Energy
  • Advertising
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
Home»Maritime»Is The Black Rock, CK Hutchison Port Deal In Peril?
Maritime

Is The Black Rock, CK Hutchison Port Deal In Peril?

March 16, 2025
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

China’s CK Hutchison Faces Backlash Over Port Deal with U.S. Firm BlackRock

China’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office (HKMAO) reposted a commentary criticizing CK Hutchison’s port deal with U.S. firm BlackRock as a betrayal of China, sending shares of the Hong Kong-based conglomerate sharply lower on Friday.

The repost of the critical state media commentary by China’s governing body overseeing the territory highlights the complex geopolitical pressures the firm faces, as investors worry the deal could be derailed without Beijing’s backing.

CK Hutchison said last week it agreed to sell most of the global $22.8 billion ports business, including assets it holds along the strategically important Panama Canal, to a group led by BlackRock. In total, the consortium will control 43 ports in 23 countries. U.S. President Donald Trump, who has called for the waterway to be removed from what he says is Chinese ownership, has hailed the deal.

On Thursday, the Ta Kung Pao newspaper based in Hong Kong published a commentary saying the deal “betrays and sells out the whole of Chinese people,” neglects national interests and shows CK Hutchison is profit-seeking. The commentary, reposted on HKMAO’s website, said the U.S. would constrain China’s maritime trade and Chinese companies would face great risks in logistics and supply chains, impacting China’s Belt and Road initiatives. “This deal is an act of hegemony by the U.S., which uses its state power to infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of other countries through despicable means such as coercion, pressure, and inducement,” the commentary wrote.

See also  Nautilus Federation Report Addresses Seafarer Recruitment & Retention

Shares of CK Hutchison closed down 6.4%, underperforming a rise of 2.1% in the benchmark Heng Sang Index. A Hong Kong-founded and -listed firm owned by billionaire Li Ka-shing, CK Hutchison has said its business operations are independent from China.

Hong Kong’s edge as an international financial center is expected to erode further as it gets squeezed by geopolitical tensions, executives and analysts said. Some shipping companies are moving operations out of Hong Kong and taking vessels off its flag registry.

This is not the first time billionaire Li has been in Beijing’s crosshairs. In 2015, Chinese media commentaries criticized him for abandoning China by extensively selling his assets at a time of economic tension in the country.

While CK Hutchison agreed to negotiations with the BlackRock consortium on an exclusive basis for 145 days according to a statement, the deal has not been finalized yet.

(Reuters)

Black deal Hutchison Peril Port rock
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related Posts

North Sea yields ‘significant’ black gold discovery

August 21, 2025

Boats Group lawsuit alleges monopoly in US listings

August 21, 2025

MOL Cruises Names New Ship ‘MITSUI OCEAN SAKURA’ Ahead Of 2026 Launch

August 21, 2025
Top Posts

Duties of Bosun (Boatswain) on a Ship

February 1, 2025

Sea-Doo Switch recall underway after serious safety concerns

March 2, 2025

China Fights Australia’s Plans to Reclaim Darwin Port Citing U.S. Influence

May 27, 2025

Fire-Stricken Wan Hai 503 Continues to Drift Off Indian Coast as Salvage Efforts Intensify

June 11, 2025
Don't Miss
Oil & Gas

Plans for California’s offshore oil platform trio to be back online by year-end fuel opposition as new entrants join legal fight

July 31, 2025

The Resumption of Oil Production in California Sparks Legal Battle After a decade-long hiatus, the…

Countries registering 70% of global tonnage support a carbon levy

February 13, 2025

Petrobas Awards Fugro Four Multi-Year Contracts

June 27, 2025

Whistleblowers could collect $500K in tanker pollution case

January 2, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

About Us
About Us

Stay informed with the latest in maritime, offshore, oil & gas, and energy industries. Explore news, trends, and insights shaping the global energy landscape.

For advertising inquiries, contact us at
info@maritime247.com.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Our Picks

Two Alpha Gas Carriers to Get Enhanced Operational Support with Wärtsilä Lifecycle Agreement

July 2, 2025

Solstad scores three-year CSV fixture

January 12, 2025

10 companies shortlisted to vie for Denmark’s C02 storage funding

May 17, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

© 2025 maritime247.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertising

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.