Close Menu
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Offshore
    • Oil & Gas
    • Energy
  • Advertising
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Trending
  • NTSB Issues Preliminary Report on Mexican Navy Tall Ship Collision with Brooklyn Bridge
  • Second floating solar plant on the way for Norway’s northernmost fish farm
  • Shelf Drilling rig staying five more years with Aramco
  • ECO Liberty Service Operations Vessel Launched To
  • U.S.-Built ECO Liberty Ushers in New Era for American Offshore Wind Vessels
  • AAL: Sixth methanol-ready MPP newbuild delivered
  • Two more multimillion-dollar vessel gigs land on DOF’s task list in Brazilian waters
  • Triton Anchor Gets Patents for Floating Renewables Anchoring Tech
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Tech
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Oil & Gas
    • Offshore
    • Energy
  • Advertising
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
Home»Incidents»NTSB Finds Communication Gap Led to $4.5 Million Crane Accident at Charleston Terminal
Incidents

NTSB Finds Communication Gap Led to $4.5 Million Crane Accident at Charleston Terminal

March 31, 2025
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

The National Transportation Safety Board Releases Findings on Crane Accident at North Charleston Terminal

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released findings on a costly crane accident at North Charleston Terminal that resulted in $4.5 million in damage when a crane barge struck a ship-to-shore crane during cargo operations.

The incident occurred on January 4, 2024, when the towing vessel Royal Engineer, while pushing the crane barge Stevens 1471, attempted to navigate a challenging passage between the containership Celsius Nicosia and a dredging vessel on the Cooper River.

According to NTSB investigators, the accident stemmed from delayed communication between the Royal Engineer’s mate and the dredge crew. Despite multiple attempts to establish contact for passing arrangements, communication wasn’t achieved until approximately 15 minutes before reaching the critical area.

The situation became complicated when the dredge captain suggested a western passage, contrary to the mate’s original plan to request breaking the pipeline for an eastern route. The two parties agreed to proceed through the narrow corridor between the dredge and the containership.


The horizontal extent of the North Charleston Terminal ship-to-shore crane. (Source: NTSB)

The critical oversight occurred during these passing arrangements. The Royal Engineer’s mate failed to account for the ship-to-shore crane’s extension beyond the containership’s side, which created an overhead hazard.

In its safety message, the NTSB emphasized that “Ship-to-shore cranes, when conducting cargo operations on a vessel and in the lowered position, may extend considerably beyond the side of the vessel and become a hazard to vessels with high air drafts transiting nearby.”

The agency stressed the importance of mariners considering their vessel and tow’s air draft when identifying navigational hazards.

See also  UK Ship Master Gets Suspended Sentence, Company Fined £180,000 in Fatal Baltic Sea Collision

The complete findings are available in Marine Investigation Report 25-09.

logo

Subscribe for Daily Maritime Insights

Sign up for gCaptain’s newsletter and never miss an update

— trusted by our 108,945 members

accident Charleston Communication Crane Finds Gap Led Million NTSB Terminal
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related Posts

NTSB Issues Preliminary Report on Mexican Navy Tall Ship Collision with Brooklyn Bridge

June 30, 2025

Maersk Sues as Controversy Emerges Over Bidding for Santos’ New Terminal

June 27, 2025

US-Sanctioned Tanker Heads To Russian Export Terminal Supplying Europe

June 26, 2025
Top Posts

Car Carrier ‘Morning Midas’ Catches Fire with Electric Vehicles Off Alaska

June 5, 2025

China Fights Australia’s Plans to Reclaim Darwin Port Citing U.S. Influence

May 27, 2025

Denmark awards first-ever offshore wind farm life extension permit

June 4, 2025

Fire-Stricken Wan Hai 503 Continues to Drift Off Indian Coast as Salvage Efforts Intensify

June 11, 2025
Don't Miss
Environment

TECO 2030 files for bankruptcy

December 30, 2024

TECO 2030 TECO 2030, European Marine Fuel Cell Developer, Files for Bankruptcy One of Europe’s…

Steerprop Launches Largest Retractable Thruster

May 29, 2025

Wood brings in $2bn Asia Pacific contracts

May 26, 2025

Eco Wave Power and BPCL seal the deal for wave energy development in India

February 14, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

About Us
About Us

Stay informed with the latest in maritime, offshore, oil & gas, and energy industries. Explore news, trends, and insights shaping the global energy landscape.

For advertising inquiries, contact us at
info@maritime247.com.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Our Picks

U.S. Launches First Offshore Mineral Lease Review in 30 Years Near American Samoa

June 13, 2025

Strategic Marine delivers vessel duo to Thai player

April 23, 2025

The Switch to supply shaft generator drives to LNG tanker quartet

May 9, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

© 2025 maritime247.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertising

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.