Close Menu
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Technology
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Offshore
    • Oil & Gas
    • Energy
  • Advertising
  • Contact
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Trending
  • China Launches First & World’s Fifth Carrier Rocket Maritime Recovery Ship
  • Following upgrades, European JV-owned cable layer goes to 1.1 GW Irish offshore wind farm
  • UK opens Allocation Round 7 for contracts for difference scheme
  • Chiyoda building third tank for compatriot’s LNG terminal
  • U.K. pilots launch interactive aid to compliance with new SOLAS pilot transfer reg
  • Eco Wave Power Makes Progress with US Wave Energy Pilot Installation
  • Coscso Seeks 20% of Hutchison Deal as US Calls for Ouster from Panama
  • Synera and Dong Fang Offshore Sign 15-Year Offshore Wind SOV Deal
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
  • Home
  • Maritime
  • Offshore
  • Port
  • Oil & Gas
  • Energy
  • Tech
  • Incidents
  • Environment
  • Events
    • Maritime
    • Oil & Gas
    • Offshore
    • Energy
  • Advertising
Maritime247.comMaritime247.com
Home»Maritime»IMO mid-term measures tipped to add 80% premium to bunker costs by 2035
Maritime

IMO mid-term measures tipped to add 80% premium to bunker costs by 2035

May 8, 2025
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

The Impact of IMO’s Net Zero Framework on the Bunker Market

British consultancy Maritime Strategies International (MSI) has given an early indication of the impact that the International Maritime Organization’s recently agreed Net Zero Framework will have on the bunker market.

By extending the annual fuel consumption estimates calculated for 2024 through to 2035, and applying MSI’s forecasts for bunker prices, it is possible to project the future fuel costs for conventionally-fuelled ships alongside the projected IMO penalties. By this approach, the IMO’s penalties would be equivalent to an 82% premium on top of the fleet bunker costs by 2035 – almost $100bn for the 30,000 ships tracked in MSI’s database.

From another perspective, this also highlights the opportunity for the shipping bunker market – an annual pot directed towards drop-in biofuels and low carbon alternatives that could rise to $100bn per year within the next decade.

Global Price on Carbon Emissions

Shipping is set to become the only sector in the world with the first-ever global price on carbon emissions following last months’s 83rd gathering of the Marine Environment Protection Committee at the IMO’s London headquarters.

Simply put, from 2028, shipowners who do not meet certain emission targets will have to pay a penalty, buy carbon credits or use credits purchased earlier.

While it won’t fully close the current price gap between green and fossil fuels, this first-of-its-kind regulatory framework will bring them closer in an effort to accelerate a transition to cleaner fuels.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

Ships missing the IMO emission tougher target would initially have to pay $100 annually for every tonne of CO₂ emissions that exceeds this goal.

See also  Fascinated By Shipwrecks; USS Monitor

Those falling below the weaker target would have to pay up to $380 for every tonne of emissions above this level.

Ships could pay that money to the IMO or buy credits from vessels that meet both targets by running on lower-carbon fuels.

Utilizing Revenues for Decarbonization

The IMO can use these revenues to compensate ships using low-carbon fuels, while investing in decarbonising the maritime sector, and addressing any negative impacts of the measures on food security.

Add bunker Costs IMO Measures midterm premium tipped
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email

Related Posts

China Launches First & World’s Fifth Carrier Rocket Maritime Recovery Ship

August 9, 2025

U.K. pilots launch interactive aid to compliance with new SOLAS pilot transfer reg

August 8, 2025

Iraq Navy Detains Oil Tanker In Smuggling Crackdown

August 8, 2025
Top Posts

Duties of Bosun (Boatswain) on a Ship

February 1, 2025

China Fights Australia’s Plans to Reclaim Darwin Port Citing U.S. Influence

May 27, 2025

Fire-Stricken Wan Hai 503 Continues to Drift Off Indian Coast as Salvage Efforts Intensify

June 11, 2025

Car Carrier ‘Morning Midas’ Catches Fire with Electric Vehicles Off Alaska

June 5, 2025
Don't Miss
Maritime

what does the electric propulsion industry need next?

January 13, 2025

Overall, the marine industry has made significant strides in transitioning towards electric propulsion. However, to…

Tariffs On Canadian & Mexican Crude Spark Debate

February 4, 2025

Vinci Acquires W?rtsil?’s Marine Electronics to Strengthen Defense Business

July 17, 2025

Oil Spill in Mississippi Delta Marshland Continues

May 1, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

About Us
About Us

Stay informed with the latest in maritime, offshore, oil & gas, and energy industries. Explore news, trends, and insights shaping the global energy landscape.

For advertising inquiries, contact us at
info@maritime247.com.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube LinkedIn
Our Picks

Work to Begin Expanding London Gateway Into UK’s Largest Container Port

March 22, 2025

Mediterranean shipping gears up for stricter emission regulations

May 1, 2025

NSTA and Crown Estate Scotland to team up on North Sea energy, carbon storage

May 17, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Your Weekly Dive into Maritime & Energy News.

© 2025 maritime247.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertising

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.